The code that is DNA

[Yukon_Jack]

The greater point is that you haven’t observed or have the proof of one species turning into another completely different kind of creature.

The greater  point is your ignorant and the scientific community rejects your conclusion

---

As for evolution itself, deep time gradualism is Darwin’s theory. Even paleontologists are quite aware of problems w abrupt appearance of new species , like new body plans coming on relatively suddenly as evidenced in the Cambrian explosion.or to put it another way, in the fossil record, this forced Gould to propose punctuated equilibrium, so you can make it up as you go along

1. Cambrian explosion wasn't sudden 

2.H didn't invent it he observed it 

Again ignorance straight from creationist propaganda

---

Well the relatively short time( and 25 million years is the high estimate ) got Gould pretty worried or he wouldn’t have conjured up his equilibrium theory to save face.

The abrupt “evolution” of diverse life forms all over the world at about the same time does cause you problems

1.It's still a long time 

2.It didn't worry him and he observed something and proposed an explanation for it 

3. No it wasn't at the same time

Obviously it did worry him. Your minimizing the issue is totally unconvincing especially when you gloss over the magnitude of what is at hand and ignore. You are the emperor w out clothes to anyone capable of critical thinking