RE: The code that is DNA
January 13, 2020 at 7:22 am
(This post was last modified: January 13, 2020 at 7:23 am by Abaddon_ire.)
(January 10, 2020 at 12:27 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:Tour is full of it. I have no need to watch his video, but I did anyway just for the sake of completeness. Frankly, lying for jebus does not impress. I have no idea why you think it would.(January 10, 2020 at 10:05 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Mutations are constrained by chemistry, they can't be just anything and therefore can't be TOTALLY random. And natural selection is a de-randomizing process. In fact, when environmental conditions are stable, it is most likely to preserve the status quo, delaying or preventing speciation (though genetic drift would still be in play). I have a good layman's understanding of the modern synthesis of the theory of biological evolution and some familiarity with the ideas of the extended synthesis; and I've read a couple of Darwin's books so I believe that I have a good grasp of his initial proposals on the matter.
I suppose it would have been quite a coincidence if I had guessed right since I haven't seen the video. What was the one you were referring to?
You haven’t even seen tours video yet you proclaim falsely of a straw man. You are a classic case of dishonest stupidity!
When your friends here can’t combat honestly , they resort to childish name calling,
Very little cerebral activity here
Nor why YOU would also lie for jebus.
(January 10, 2020 at 12:27 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:Nope. Argument from personal incredulity is a fallacy. Grow up.(January 10, 2020 at 10:42 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: After they found DNA precursors in comets I stopped laughing at ID people and started laughing at their parents. Their kids can help it if they were born stupid.
https://youtu.be/VUfNEHl44hc
If you found something that looked like a piece of metal , would you assume an automobile would inevitably be created from it? There is no such thing as a simple cell and Tour highlights the profound impossibility of abiogenesis
Your problem here is that you are claiming that nobody can explain abiogenesis. Not you. Not James Tour, not anybody.
That is CURRENTLY true, but science is actively working on that.
But then you claim that YOU have a whole and complete explanation. Ex nihilo. You simply made it up and declared it to be an explanation. Just because. That is a childs explanation. Hell, even my own children are beyond such trite non-explanations that explain nothing.
Why is it that you are unable to move beyond childish things? Can you explain that? Can you explain yourself?
