(February 14, 2020 at 10:23 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: I have reached a conclusion that people who think hell is "unjustified" and too "brutal" are very naive people with 0 experience in crimes, or they are criminals themselves who never want to taste punishment for their deeds.
The conclusion was reached after spending about 10 years of examining the aftermath of real crimes, especially seeing the images of dead victims before and after the crime.
Hell is so justified. There is no "but"; my consciousness is way better after knowing that the criminal would be thrown in a fire pit to suffer over and over and over. Some people say "how could finite crime result in infinite torture"; but who said hell is infinite? it's heavily long but not infinite, long as in these numbers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_o...far_future
Again; what does life worth? isn't it priceless? it is so priceless, so precious, it is the prospering of mankind in a planet surrounded by emptiness, it is so precious and beyond limit.
I believe that so many do not know how it feels to be born healthy and pretty, but you get that life stripped away from you by the psychopath.
Hell is justified. Just think about all those who suffered in their deaths by the hands of psychopaths.
That's called 'Revenge' when you think like that AtlasS23.
Do I think repeat ofenders who've been presented before the Justice system need different treatment han those who have not? Yes.
Though I would also note that the many and varied cirumstances which bring repeat offenders before the Justice system ned also be acknowledged and hopefully adressed.
But... To punish some one for EVER for something they've done? The whole oncept is so weird as for me to find it worhtless even as some sort of threat.
Since, y'know', 'Hell' (other than the town some where) isn't real.
So you're using a concept to mentally threaten people with as some way to control their behaviour?
There's words for doing things like that AtlasS23.
Not at work.