(February 18, 2020 at 11:01 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Good point Bel, he was not executed for science, he was executed for thinking and speaking (rather unscientific for the most part) ideas the church disapproved of. He was more a martyr for free speech.
(February 20, 2020 at 4:35 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: Ah, as expected, Belacqua opens a topic and then calls his boyfriend who is the "attitude" in the relationship to tell us about the atheist conspiracy of "fabricating the history" and "everything that you read about history is wrong".
Another irrational outburst full of baseless slurs and sneering fantasy. So, you have no actual evidence-based argument against any of the detailed information and analysis I've given? Yes, I thought so. What I can't work out is why supposed rationalists get so emotional about these pseudo historical fairy tales being debunked that they act like gormless fundamentalists and/or screaming toddlers in public. This behaviour is simply embarrassing.