(February 22, 2020 at 8:56 pm)Belacqua Wrote:(February 22, 2020 at 8:35 pm)brewer Wrote: Which makes it sound like the church had valid reasons for killing.
I have stated over and over that it was bad for the church to kill him.
Quote:BTW, he was a scientist that the catholics killed. The End.
You have entirely failed to show that this is true.
It doesn't matter. The church killed him. You cannot rehabilitate him by quibbling about their reasons. The simple fact remains that they killed him. He remains dead.
Did they do it for the wrong reasons? Sure.
Did they do it for the right reasons? Of course not.
It doesn't really matter. They killed him. Your church killed him.
You make a huge play out of this minutae. Simply because you want to recast the church at the time as being "in error", but your faith is not.