A.S.K. your way to proof.

[Drich]

Drich, is there any way you could make at least a token effort to not be so full of yourself? Bragging on the tremendous impact you've had on the forum is not only not a good look; it's not remotely true. You're still here because you follow the rules, at least close enough for horseshoes, and that's all any of us have to do to stay here.

Catholic lady and the group that left did not break any rules either as far as I know they are still in good standing and could return any time. They left because the pendulum swings both ways. IE the rules protect you guys from what some may deem overly sensitive feelings. just like they protect me from your sore bottoms as well.

And I am not bragging about anything that I know of. and IF YOU WOULD READ what I wrote I said there was a decline in this forum BECAUSE the OTHER CHRISTIANS LEFT!!!

Which left you tards with no one to oppose your specific level of religious understanding.

And I made the observation that they literally changed the meaning of the rules over there, as this debate already came up and the no spamming rule was deemed not to have applied to me or what i was doing... but then i guess enough atheist threaten to quit the site, and now the same rule the tried to charge me with before, and i was exonerated from, now condemned me. They didn't even change the wording, just the rule's supposed intent.

In fact the rule for spam is about the same here.
Spamming is not allowed. Spamming includes, but is not limited to:

• Creating multiple threads with the same or similar thread subject in a short space of time.Repeatedly posting responses to existing threads that are unrelated to the current discussion(s) in the thread.
  
• Repeatedly posting links, copy/pasted content, or scripture verses, unless they are relevant to the thread and have the member's own comments added to them.
  
• Posting an abundance of content you've pre-written for purposes other than forum use (i.e. essays, blog posts, etc.)
  
  

there: 2) No spam Posting links to other websites in order to promote people, products, or ideas when not part of related discussions may be regarded as spam. Repeatedly posting the same material may also be regarded as engaging in spamming the forum.

Here's the thing, the people products or ideas were original content created for the express purpose to be a thread opener. It is no different than if I were to write everything all out. same idea, same topic, same exposition. the only thing this did... it took away the troll's ability to hammer me about my use of grammar and spelling. it also showed ability not consistent with the drich is incompetent narrative. it also provided a way to verify alot of my back ground story concerning my business and projects as that was also apart of my 7 or 8 year old youtube account page.

The ideas I brought with the video were not the issue. it was the legitimacy and me taking away the trolling opportunities/the low lying fruit that the trolls like to easily feed on that was the problem. Because any truth I provided here makes it harder to just ignore or use a sweeping dismissal on your side.

Again not bragging just an exit analysis. 

---

Drich, is there any way you could make at least a token effort to not be so full of yourself? Bragging on the tremendous impact you've had on the forum is not only not a good look; it's not remotely true. You're still here because you follow the rules, at least close enough for horseshoes, and that's all any of us have to do to stay here.

I guess some forums have higher standards than this one.

higher=elitist/Atheist only or christians on the fence standards. yes.

free thinking, independant unpopular thought, 1st amendment modeled standards. ah, no.

here is the unwritten rule that separates the two..
I-enst, Order tou bee a meme-ber of zist vebsiten! Ich, moost sink unt sprecken to zee ath-ziest, haas an ath-ziest! Nine, ut-zide sprecken vill bee toll-irated!