(April 3, 2020 at 11:39 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: The part where a sum loss in energy is a problem for intentional remediation. I don't think you appreciate the goal of recycled fuels.
You sound like Trump. Expounding upon that which you have no real knowledge. Somebody stuck a PC term (recycle) on something and you swallowed it whole.
Exactly what do you think this process gains? The only way it reduces atmospheric contamination is if you DON'T BURN IT. If you do - you have the exact same amounts of hydrogen and carbon you started out with PLUS whatever contamination you create using the energy to make the fuel.