RE: A.S.K. your way to proof.
May 5, 2020 at 4:55 am
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2020 at 4:56 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
(May 5, 2020 at 4:50 am)Bucky Ball Wrote:I think he meant Trinitarianism and i think he means there was no single orthodoxy but many parallel ones among different groups(May 4, 2020 at 11:23 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Arianism was an orthodox view that simply could not compete with Triantarism. Once again. was Arianism a heresy? (Answer: No, Aranism became a heresy, largely, because of the Emperor Constantine's instistance of religious unity within his empire so as to foster political unity.) But, even after the Nicene Creed became "official", why did Arianism persist within Christendom? You might want to read the Nicene Creed, and, in particular, the Creed's statement of Jesus' Parousia and Christendom's reinterpretation of that so-called "dogma".
What the hell is Triantarism ?
So .... first you say there was no orthodoxy, and now you're saying Arianism was "an orthodox view".
Alrighty then.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
