(May 26, 2020 at 3:10 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: There's a huge difference between fictional killing of fictional people in movies and the murders of real people by the utter scum of ISIS.
Controversially, and most people here disagree with me, which is fair enough, but I support the death penalty for certain crimes.
I also support harsh sentences for some crimes but don't support the idea of mutilations. You steal from me and you deserve punishment, you don't deserve, however much I might say it at the time, to have your hand removed.
To make a society clear of robberies, the act of stealing must have a harsh consequence.
I stressed out that judgement's environment to have a council that judge, acting as the "jury". A jury of 10 or 20 people picked randomly in each case and the vote of each to carry out the sentence or not would make the mutilation sentence "more fair".
The Quran stated that the jury is essential in here:
Quote:Sura 42, The Quran:
https://quran.ksu.edu.sa/index.php?l=en#...rans=en_sh
( 38 ) And those who have responded to their lord and established prayer and whose affair is [determined by] consultation among themselves, and from what We have provided them, they spend.
The affair must be determined for a Muslim via consultation among other Muslims. So nobody would ever be sentenced in a just court without a jury -notice that this jury is explicitly defined by the word "among themselves"-.
Just so you know; this verse is enough to send all totalitarian systems to the garbage under Islam.
