RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
May 29, 2020 at 7:00 pm
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2020 at 7:01 pm by possibletarian.)
(May 29, 2020 at 4:51 pm)Belacqua Wrote:(May 29, 2020 at 4:25 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Then I’m not sure what you’re saying. I’m sorry.
No worries.
As I say, I'm through working on it. It's pretty clear that a number of people would like me to stop.
(May 29, 2020 at 4:25 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: One is; "...Entire argument is indistinguishable from an argument from ignorance,"
While the other is: "...There are things of which we are ignorant."
If I said "I don't know, therefore it must be a certain way," that would be an argument from ignorance.
But I'm not saying that.
I typed it all out yesterday, so that's enough.
Yesterday you were claiming that there is 'plenty of evidence for the supernatural' based almost entirely on 'there are things we do not know'
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
