Yeah quite right, he didn't say that I just wonder what him saying that I should also be 'reprimanded for my behavior' would involve lol (For my behavior? I haven't broken any rules lol).
On the matter of books: I don't really read fiction...hardly have anyway. I have mostly just read shit loads of self help books in the past, TGD (and I am currently on The Blind Watchmaker), and some comedy books such as the 'Fry and Laurie' scripts and Rik Mayall's book 'The Rik Mayall, Bigger than Hitler better than Christ'.
The vast vast majority of what I read is on the internet (because I'm like, always using computers basically lol).
If I was on my computer less I'd be reading 'books' a lot more - I'd be spending a lot of my time doing that.
Atm I'm very slowly reading the Blind Watchmaker. I read TGD in a day or two (then I read small bits of it many times every day for several months) because that was just before I got this computer lol.
EvF
EDIT: Furthermore, as I have said - there's bound to be more 'fluff posts' simply because I have so many posts. But I'd say there are a vast quantiy of my posts that are big posts, and a lot of it tends to be arguing with someone such as fr0d0, or earlier, Daystar, etc, etc.
I do some very big posts too, you may have noticed. When someone has almost 3000 posts it's easier to find more 'fluff posts' simply because there are more posts!
And I believe that my posts are basically always on topic...except when I'm replying to something off-topic because the thread has already died or whatever. Topics tend to drift very often - but I always try to stay on-topic and believe I only reply off-topic when it's already drifted too much anyway.
A lot of my 'lol posts' are in response to comments that are as much as 'fluff post' themselves. It still conveys a point rather than ignoring, and it doesn't drift the topic any more than it already has by the previous 'fluff post'.
If someone posts an argument I will respond to it (and my response is often comparatively large...not exactly an "lol" post) - and I doubt you'll see me respond to an argument or something on-topic with a 'fluff post'. If you actually do - I apologise!
I reply to a post, a comment - with what I think is valid to it.
I don't reply to non-serious posts with serious posts if there isn't something serious to contribute. But then I don't respond to serious posts and discussions with 'fluff posts' or 'lols' I think you'll find. I believe I do what is valid and appropriate to the thread and/or the posts in there..?
That's my opinion anyway.
EvF
On the matter of books: I don't really read fiction...hardly have anyway. I have mostly just read shit loads of self help books in the past, TGD (and I am currently on The Blind Watchmaker), and some comedy books such as the 'Fry and Laurie' scripts and Rik Mayall's book 'The Rik Mayall, Bigger than Hitler better than Christ'.
The vast vast majority of what I read is on the internet (because I'm like, always using computers basically lol).
If I was on my computer less I'd be reading 'books' a lot more - I'd be spending a lot of my time doing that.
Atm I'm very slowly reading the Blind Watchmaker. I read TGD in a day or two (then I read small bits of it many times every day for several months) because that was just before I got this computer lol.
EvF
EDIT: Furthermore, as I have said - there's bound to be more 'fluff posts' simply because I have so many posts. But I'd say there are a vast quantiy of my posts that are big posts, and a lot of it tends to be arguing with someone such as fr0d0, or earlier, Daystar, etc, etc.
I do some very big posts too, you may have noticed. When someone has almost 3000 posts it's easier to find more 'fluff posts' simply because there are more posts!
And I believe that my posts are basically always on topic...except when I'm replying to something off-topic because the thread has already died or whatever. Topics tend to drift very often - but I always try to stay on-topic and believe I only reply off-topic when it's already drifted too much anyway.
A lot of my 'lol posts' are in response to comments that are as much as 'fluff post' themselves. It still conveys a point rather than ignoring, and it doesn't drift the topic any more than it already has by the previous 'fluff post'.
If someone posts an argument I will respond to it (and my response is often comparatively large...not exactly an "lol" post) - and I doubt you'll see me respond to an argument or something on-topic with a 'fluff post'. If you actually do - I apologise!
I reply to a post, a comment - with what I think is valid to it.
I don't reply to non-serious posts with serious posts if there isn't something serious to contribute. But then I don't respond to serious posts and discussions with 'fluff posts' or 'lols' I think you'll find. I believe I do what is valid and appropriate to the thread and/or the posts in there..?
That's my opinion anyway.
EvF
