Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse

[The Architect Of Fate]

I was responding to the charge i fell afoul of the generic fallacy . Which i pointed out  simply pointing out fire arms were military in nature does not do .And the wiki article answers your statement doubting if that fact was true .

First of all, it's the 'genetic' fallacy, not the 'generic' fallacy.  And second, there was no charge that you had fallen afoul of it.  I asked if you could make an argument from the fact you noted without running afoul of the genetic fallacy because if you can't, then none of your conclusions from that fact are valid and any conclusions that you draw are non sequiturs.  I'm not even claiming that you can't make such an argument.  I simply challenged you to do so.  Instead, we get this nonsense in reply from you.  Is English your first language, or is there a language barrier here that I am unaware of there being?

1. Sorry i must have misunderstood you and i apologize for the misspelling 

2. I did make an argument that didn't do so . Simply pointing out the original use of fire arms was war was the only point i was trying to make  . And my only conclusion was stating that fact .Though i do admit to challenging notion that using something aside in a manor it was not intended by the designer does not necessarily make it a multi use item

3.And i don't think my reply was nonesense . The first part was a misunderstanding . The second part was simply sourcing my claim that fire arms were originally used for war 

4. I believe i have stated multiple times (though perhaps not under this account ) that english in not my first language or even my second .

---

Stalking is wrong period

It doesn't matter how much you repeat that falsehood. It remains a falsehood