(September 11, 2020 at 1:48 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Probably more on account of the fact that he was stalking a black kid with a gun, but go off.
Why defend him when he's making claims he can't back up though? He didn't say maybe it was pre-meditated. He plainly said it was pre-meditated. I don't like how Zimmerman followed him either, but contrary to what has been said over and over, the police did not instruct Zimmerman not to follow Trayvon, he broke no laws in doing so, and he was allowed to be carrying a gun. And as far as the anti-gun arguments go, that's pretty much out the window now that you have rioters on the street burning businesses down, rioters marching through rural neighbourhoods scaring children and screaming for people to get out of their homes and into the streets, breaking into gated communities and threatening to kill people and their dogs and burn their houses down, dragging random people out of their cars and beating them almost to death, mobs beating up trans women on the streets, BLM supporters shooting and killing black children for crossing barriers that they put up. The anti-gun argument has no leg to stand on any more.
