Trump vs Biden debate

[Irreligious Atheist]

Rye Rye refutes you again and you are simply making excuses 

If IA can read: "We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government. And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment,and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence."  and somehow see proof that Russia didn't interfere with the election in this statement that explains that many characteristics of the attacks were consistent with Russian interference, one has to wonder just what would have convinced her.

I literally posted on the last page "It's a good thing that they were given to Wikileaks, whether it was Russia, Seth Rich as Assange seemed to strongly hint at, a combination of those two, or others."

The ones who did the investigation said that they have a high degree of confidence, but no concrete evidence. I don't care who stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks. I want all the corruption out there. It's better that people are not left in the dark, and are aware of the corruption.

Edit: Now that I've thought about it, debunked probably wasn't the right word for me to use. Technically, even God can not be debunked, because there's a slim chance that there is one. I can admit when I am wrong or have not phrased things in the best possible way. Trump colluding with Russia has not been "debunked", but there was no evidence showing collusion with Russia, which is the narrative that corporate media pushed for years. They were not able to substantiate that narrative.