RE: Let’s take their guns
November 1, 2020 at 3:57 pm
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2020 at 4:10 pm by onlinebiker.)
(November 1, 2020 at 2:00 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(November 1, 2020 at 7:54 am)onlinebiker Wrote: No I am not equating.
I am showing you a perspective.
You don't buy guns - so you have no understanding of that situation.
You do however take a piss from time to time - I assume.
Now - quit playing false equivalence and ask yourself - would you find it restrictive to play the "Mother may I?" game each time you did ANY legal ordinary action?
I’m not getting across, so I’ll try again.
Let’s say that once you pass whatever vetting process is in place to buy your first gun, all vetting for future gun purchases should be waived. In other words, once someone is determined to be a law abiding citizen, we can presume that they are ALWAYS going to be a law abiding citizen (please correct me if that’s not what you’re saying).
Sorry to be blunt, but that’s just flat out one of the stupidest positions I’ve ever heard.
Boru
(November 1, 2020 at 3:57 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(November 1, 2020 at 2:00 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’m not getting across, so I’ll try again.
Let’s say that once you pass whatever vetting process is in place to buy your first gun, all vetting for future gun purchases should be waived. In other words, once someone is determined to be a law abiding citizen, we can presume that they are ALWAYS going to be a law abiding citizen (please correct me if that’s not what you’re saying).
Sorry to be blunt, but that’s just flat out one of the stupidest positions I’ve ever heard.
Boru
We subscribe here to this silly theory - it's called "innocent til proven guilty".
You want the opposite.
...
You want gun owners to prove that they will never be a threat - which is bullshit...NOBODY can prove future actions. They can only recite the story that the "approving agency" wants to hear.
I would prefer it if we just restrict the rights of those problem children who have already proven themselves unworthy.
A one time background check would be an acceptable compromise - though I doubt it's effectiveness.