I think that was part and parcel of the point of the billionaire. To stop funding, to discourage, political advertising for a problem that is government size. The counterpoint that was brought up was that we should all do what we can an important part of what we can do is to spur the political process with money. But there are subtle tones Under the conversation That the billionaire believes we should stop supporting a broken system and start doing something short term. I just found it ironic that part of the 1%, which I considered part of the problem, would in affect Support defunding himself by the same logic.
Also side note, that is absolutely not what advertising was ever for or how it works @Angrboda
Also side note, that is absolutely not what advertising was ever for or how it works @Angrboda
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
