RE: Re-viving good and interesting topics
November 15, 2020 at 1:27 pm
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2020 at 5:47 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(November 15, 2020 at 1:12 pm)Dundee Wrote:(November 15, 2020 at 4:55 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: You can revive any topic you like, but we have a rule against replying to threads that have been inactive for more than thirty days. There is nothing to prevent you from starting a new thread on the same topic.
And to be fair, you HAVE been informally advised about it before. I suspect that part of the reason for your warnings is that you chose to ignore that advice.
Boru
As a said before: I did not "choose to ignore" a warning.
I did not see any.
--------------
That said - can somebody tell me what "harm" is done by re-viving an "old" thread, however old it might be?
When there are 3 different aspects to a case it is a good idea to have 3 threads.
No need to be personally insulting because of it.
It seems warnings are given here for un-importent small formalities.
How boring!
But not for grave personal insults.
That is the wrong way round.
And:
It seems some "atheists" are more into stupid little formalities than some religions!
My, we are having ourselves a little moan, aren’t we?
Follow the rules, and you never need worry about being banned or even warned.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax