lucent Wrote:What exactly is this interpretation of QM specifically?
Relational quantum mechanics
http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/quant-ph/pd...9002v2.pdf
lucent Wrote:If you want to reduce each person to a system which is a self contained "universe", just receiving signals from entanglements from other such universes, what is the character or quality of that existence.
The 'character' of existence is some value some system has.
lucent Wrote:It's a logically incoherent definition since all the systems are functionally interdependent, thus former a larger system, and all having a common origin. A Universe full of universes is still a Universe.
You keep assuming that there is a background space within which everything exists. Things can exist without existing within a common state space. This is the entire idea behind relativity. There isn't actually a spatial universe that we sit within. Space is created by relationship.
So, the point actually is the opposite. This is the exact same idea as relativity, applied to quantized systems. In this interpretation, values are only definable relative to one another and there is no 'common origin'. Otherwise, they would all be definable relative to that. Which they aren't (same as relativity).
lucent Wrote:God is objective in that He knows everything and every possible perspective simultaneously. God is subjective in that He is arbitrary.
How does being arbitrary make something subjective?
I'm new to the board. I'm really wasting my time, aren't I?
I thought this might be an interesting discussion. I was wrong.
