(December 7, 2020 at 11:35 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: What inherent hypocrisy? The person in question doesn't appear to wear a scarf on hear head or crotch to symbolize the patriarchy, as a gateway to punitive measures, or as an act of pro woman beating advocacy. You've decided that she's a token, though, on account of her wearing a scarf on hear head or crotch. Something to consider.
Would you allow a person who had black-faced out of jest organizing BLM rally? The point is not that she enforces patriarchy. Point is her inability to be consistent between what she is advocating and what she herself has unable to reflect.
There have been countless examples where people with questionable racial blurbs were called off or publicly shunned when they took a podium that contradicted their stance.
Here is one example of fearing of not seen as accepting "others" can lead to injustice.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho...83146.html