(November 3, 2011 at 4:01 pm)frankiej Wrote: Then you are a very disturbed individual. I feel sorry for you.
Nothing disturbed going on here; care to demonstrate why the innocent can’t atone for the guilty or am I supposed to just accept your bare assertions?
(November 3, 2011 at 6:19 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: No, I'm calling you a liar because I don't believe what you said happened.
Why don’t you believe it? Do you have any evidence to back up your assertion? Did you know me before I was introduced to the TAG?
Quote: Variation on the same theme. Same counter argument applies. These are bare assertions on one topic used to prove something in a completely unrelated topic.
Haha, what is this? So you can try and refute some other argument and claim it applies as a refutation for TAG? That’s absurd!
“All squares have four sides, figure A is a square, therefore figure A has four sides.”
Along comes you….”I will refute your argument above.”
“Ok, go ahead.”
“Circles have corners…..that’s a bare assertion. There your argument is refuted.”
“Wait a second, my argument never mentioned circles….”
“Oh well they both deal with shapes so it still applies.”
Quote:Really?
Yes, really.
Quote: So if the government announced today that there would be a new policy of allowing friends or relatives to take the place of convicted criminals in their punishment, allowing said convicted criminals to go free, you'd support that?
Nope.
Quote:You can't prove a negative.
So then you believe that humans can naturally fly?
