Quote:I want to stress that the whole point of well managed hunting is to not have to do culls in the first place. To not be in that situation. I think that there's a very specific circumstance where criticism of culling applies. When bcc is high and ccc is low. It's not biologically necessary to cull those deer. The town has a financial or social interest in culling them.Well managed hunting is a myth
Quote:There are clear site demonstrations of deer managed for hunting at historic levels which don't destroy biodiversity, they increase it. Which manage the population well below ccc while increasing the bcc. I think that, rather than paying for these expensive and ineffective culls, or planning not to plan - just letting nature run it's course...they should use those models to generate income for their communities and their conservation efforts.1.Really care to give an example (then watch me refute it)
Quote:Put a simpler way....with respect to what I think each group wants....Nah i have a better one
Hunters want there to be more and healthier game.
Animal activists want there to be fewer hunters
Hunters want game they don't care how they get it
Animal activists want more and healthier animals but don't believe hunting is a good solution to the problem
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM