(January 25, 2021 at 2:24 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:This is bullshit and you know it.Quote:I want to stress that the whole point of well managed hunting is to not have to do culls in the first place. To not be in that situation. I think that there's a very specific circumstance where criticism of culling applies. When bcc is high and ccc is low. It's not biologically necessary to cull those deer. The town has a financial or social interest in culling them.Well managed hunting is a myth
Quote:There are clear site demonstrations of deer managed for hunting at historic levels which don't destroy biodiversity, they increase it. Which manage the population well below ccc while increasing the bcc. I think that, rather than paying for these expensive and ineffective culls, or planning not to plan - just letting nature run it's course...they should use those models to generate income for their communities and their conservation efforts.1.Really care to give an example (then watch me refute it)
Quote:Put a simpler way....with respect to what I think each group wants....Nah i have a better one
Hunters want there to be more and healthier game.
Animal activists want there to be fewer hunters
Hunters want game they don't care how they get it
Animal activists want more and healthier animals but don't believe hunting is a good solution to the problem
This is another of your bash OLB diatribes. Maybe post another dozen or so links, that'll bring everyone over to your way of thinking.
Why don't you just stay away from OLB posts...save yourself and the rest of us the heartburn of your dick waving contests.