1. You realize there is data that contradicts both assumptions
2.Once again for funding that simply isn't so. More non-hunters than hunters fund conservation.
3.Hunters are paying to collect data they are paying to shoot animals and grudgingly producing data. The idea they can't be replaced is absurd.
4.If the only reason he is willing to pay taxes is to shoot the animals I think that rather backs my point about their motivations.
5.Yup will likely shoot animals. That doesn't mean we need to endorse it, And again about the funding.
2.Once again for funding that simply isn't so. More non-hunters than hunters fund conservation.
3.Hunters are paying to collect data they are paying to shoot animals and grudgingly producing data. The idea they can't be replaced is absurd.
4.If the only reason he is willing to pay taxes is to shoot the animals I think that rather backs my point about their motivations.
5.Yup will likely shoot animals. That doesn't mean we need to endorse it, And again about the funding.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
