RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
March 6, 2021 at 1:21 am
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2021 at 1:26 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:I think your example is a bit off. Darkness doesn't make blindness more adaptable. Whether its day or night―you can't see.Darkness allows for a host of unique adaptions and niches
(March 6, 2021 at 12:04 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: But darkness makes it useful because they can develop other features that beings who can see don't have, like I said: "because they can use that energy and part of the brain for something else that will make it thrive".Moles, in particular, have a number of special adaptions in their olfactory system and their ability to sense vibrations in the soil.
For instance, this is what Darwin wrote about moles:
Quote:The eyes of moles and of some burrowing rodents are rudimentary in size, and in some cases are quite covered by skin and fur. This state of the eyes is probably due to gradual reduction from disuse, but aided perhaps by natural selection. ...
As frequent inflammation of the eyes must be injurious to any animal, and as eyes are certainly not necessary to animals having subterranean habits, a reduction in their size, with the adhesion of the eyelids and growth of fur over them, might in such case be an advantage; and if so, natural selection would aid the effects of disuse.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM