RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
March 6, 2021 at 5:11 pm
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2021 at 5:20 pm by Angrboda.)
(March 6, 2021 at 5:02 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(March 6, 2021 at 4:30 pm)Angrboda Wrote: You still haven't answered my earlier challenge to demonstrate the existence of elementary particles, either. Until you do, you got nothing.
OMG. ?! The very objective of particle physics is to identify these elementary particles, did you even bother and look up any of these terms?
For fermions like quarks, which are elementary particles, there are known experiments in the literature like "Deep inelastc scattering" which do provide empirical evidence for their existence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_inelastic_scattering
More recently, you have the Higgs boson, the well-known fundamental particle, which was confirmed to exist in 2013
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_for...iggs_boson
Anything else?
I didn't need to look them up. Physics has demonstrated their existence. It hasn't demonstrated they have no structure. Until it does, you can't assert them as elementary particles.
Meanwhile, in all your shitposting, the point still has not been addressed. Let me remind you of what it is:
(March 6, 2021 at 2:13 pm)Angrboda Wrote: The point is that two particles as an example of complexity is absurd. Your argument reduces to a bunch of equivocations.