(March 10, 2021 at 10:24 am)Apollo Wrote: Design argument is an anthropomorphic argument—if you take that as a valid hypothesis then you’d expect per more matter in the universe to give it semblance of a design, allowing designable, interesting things to happen more frequently in abundance. A cold, black, empty space doesn’t support such logical conclusion based on such hypothesis.
For a hypothesis to be taken seriously it has to be logically consistent and not some contortion that would bend the logic to fit the hypothesis.
Why doesn't a cold black empty space support such a conclusion? Why would I expect "per more matter"?
When you say it doesn't have the semblance of design, what criteria are you using to judge what design looks like?