(March 10, 2021 at 4:45 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Wouldn't that be answered in the very first sentence of the quoted material?It's always interesting how poorly designed in nature looks indistinguishable from not designed and how their doesn't seem to be any way to distinguish them that isn't fallacious or circular.
If we take an anthropomorphic argument as a valid hypothesis, then those are the criteria that we're going to use to judge what looks designed, designed for what... and.... just flat out assuming that it is...the quality of that design. There could be any number of potential applications for a designed universe such as our own - but..expanding into...by the parameters of the alleged design itself, isn't one of them. Space is either poorly designed for this purpose, or not designed for such a purpose at all.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
