(March 12, 2021 at 1:08 pm)Angrboda Wrote: If you don't know what it would look like then in what way have you presented an observation which would be falsifying?
In many ways this is a benefit for your side not mine. There may be a multitude of ways in which things are not designable; just like there are a multitude of ways in which objects are not graspable (e.g. too big, too small, too slippery, too sharp, too spikey). The only general way to describe something as "not graspable," is quite literally to not be able to grasp it. Likewise, the only general way to describe something is "not designable" is quiet literally to not be able to design it.
(I'll look into the Heidegger being and time subject.)
