The Watchmaker: my fav argument

[John 6IX Breezy]

Why does everything have to be designable if Intelligent Design is true?

Simply because that is a claim of the theory. Design is intelligence-dependent, meaning that it obviously varies across the gradient of species. But Intelligent Design as a theory encompasses everything because that is what it predicts that gods, or simulations, can do.

---

Design describes a mental act.  Evidence of design might exist apart from the designer, but if you want evidence of a specific designer then you need evidence of that mental act.

Are you describing mental acts because Belacqua and I discussed it earlier? Or because you are making a new argument? I ask because I've obviously covered many of these things, but I have no way of knowing whose keeping up and whose catching the tail-end of it. That said, I'm not looking for evidence, I'm looking for falsification.