(March 20, 2021 at 12:31 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Yup it's pure laziness(March 20, 2021 at 9:54 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: Very well, we may disagree on some details but I'd like to address another argument that you made earlier:
And you know that because? Your argument mirrors that of the behaviorists which claimed cognition was an unobservable black box—that's no longer true. From atoms to the neuron doctrine, science is full of once unobservable entities that had to be inferred. Your inability to think of an observation has no bearing on the question.
But what we CAN observe about the universe doesn’t logically lead to an inference of design. Observation leads to the inference that the universe wasn’t designed, but evolved. The only way to claim the universe is designed is to admit ignorance, which is what creationists always do.
‘If the universe was deliberately designed, why do species go extinct? Shouldn’t a perfect Creator have designed them to be able to cope with issues like habitat loss or changes in climate?’
‘That’s God’s plan.’
‘Seems kind of slipshod, doesn’t it?’
‘Well, God’s ways are mysterious. We can possibly know why he does things the way he does.’
Boru
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM