RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
March 20, 2021 at 2:28 pm
(This post was last modified: March 20, 2021 at 2:46 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(March 20, 2021 at 2:11 pm)Angrboda Wrote: Please don't waste our time. Dembski's argument explicitly appealed to design in its grounding premises.
It doesn't matter what anyone appeals to (including your appeal to Dembski); you are still responsible for the validity of your own arguments. The premise that the universe was designed could be true, and the conclusion that life is irreducibly complex still be false. Obviously—many Christians believe God used evolution in his design. Irreducible complexity is specifically an argument against evolution. There's no debate here, so please don't waste my time.