RE: Chauvin Murder Trial
April 16, 2021 at 3:23 pm
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2021 at 3:23 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(April 16, 2021 at 2:52 pm)HappySkeptic Wrote:(April 16, 2021 at 12:23 am)Brian37 Wrote: No shit . Out of all the cross examination, and defense arguments, this has to be the most fucking rediculous defense.
The purpose of the defense is to confuse, and provide talking points or cover for a potential police-friendly juror.
If they really wanted to prove that Floyd died of carbon monoxide poisoning, there would've been evidence of that.
"Reasonable Doubt" can sometimes be translated as "bulshit".
That’s the tactic: when reasonable doubt doesn’t exist, try to create it.
I doubt the CO defense is going to go anywhere or carry much weight with the jurors. It’s equivalent to saying that Chauvin didn’t choke Floyd to death - he threw him off a cliff, so he’s not guilty.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
