[Serious] Good People

[John 6IX Breezy]

"Ambiguity"?

What 'Ambiguity'?

This is a new and unencountered virus, is it not?

Some one comming into contact with said virus unvaccinated has zero inbuilt immunities to said virus, correct?

They are litteraly at the mercy of chance. That their systems can detect and cope with said virus right off the bat, with no sort of previous warning encounter such as people have had with the various strains of avian infuenza, correct?

As for 'Consent.

If a shark takes a leg off then medical proceedures are most certainly forces up a person's body.
So 'Consent' seems  only to go as far as "Helping people not die.".

There are risks on either side of the aisle here. You are taking a risk by not getting vaccinated, and you are likewise taking a risk by being vaccinated. These risks are often not communicated; and its painfully obvious that many people that are in favor of vaccines, are simply hiding behind the label of "vaccine" as if it carried special powers. This isn't a traditional vaccine; it is perhaps only a vaccine in function but not in kind, the effects of which are still under investigation.

Take for example a recent issue that is being discussed about the spike proteins found both in the virus and the vaccine: Its uncertain whether the spike proteins in the vaccine can cause damage. Its uncertain what happens if the vaccines leaves the intermuscular tissue and enters the lungs. More importantly, its uncertain what the long terms effects of the vaccine are. (Note: The article I linked attempts to address these questions and argue why the vaccine is safe, but it does so because these are genuine concerns that we are stumbling across.) 

My point is this: These are question that are currently being asked and researched while people are already taking the vaccines. Pretending that we already know the answers, and that those hesitating to get vaccinated are ignorant, is the wrong approach.