(June 9, 2021 at 12:25 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: No; one has a chance to be viable, the other does not. (Clearly one twin is alive in the womb unless contraindicated.)
Unless you meant to say one of them has a chance to become a human organism (the label used by Neo) and the other does not, what exactly does this bring to the table for you?
Great, then we should fix that wouldn't you agree?
viable........live........ mincing words does not change the biologic facts.
JFC you're going to some extreme lengths. Yes, one has the potential for life outside the womb as my previous stated position to Neo. Neo passed up his offer to define.
Great? How, at this time and with current technology do you propose the fix? Which part of to late by the time of diagnosis don't you understand?
Somebody wants unborn human rights now, without conditions.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
