(June 9, 2021 at 3:17 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: That's not an invalid argument whether you disagree with it or not. That's how logic works:
If human organisms deserve X rights, and zygotes are human organisms, then zygotes deserve X rights.
I don't have an antidote for your moral confoundment. Your best bet here is to argue against the premise that all humans deserve X rights.
It is a category error. You take a statement from one category of human (actual persons), and try to change the category (to include blastocysts and zygotes) yet make the same claim.
If human organisms deserve X rights
Just as you can't define God into existence, you can't define zygote rights into existence.