RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 9:15 pm
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2021 at 9:21 pm by R00tKiT.)
(June 30, 2021 at 9:03 pm)tackattack Wrote: I had to skip pages 6-10 this is a hot mess. Let’s use your definition then Klor- “ by natural = any action that serves our instincts of survival+procreation” could finding love serve our instincts for survival within a society? If u answer yes and sexual orientation is currently estimated @25% genetic according to your article; fulfilling the need to be loved by whatever you deem fit serves individuals. Whether you get it, or whether u have oughts that get in the way is irrelevant. It’s good for people to find love and harmony. Have you been helping that end or are u too worried about your tail end being violated?
Homosexuality is as condemned in my religion as it is in yours. There exist some biblical passages mentioning Sodom and Gomorrah, if I recall that correctly. It's really hilarious that a christian is seriously apologising for homosexuality.
Words like love and harmony aren't exactly very precise labels one can use to articulate an apology for men-on-men sex. Tell me, if you find love and harmony with your neighbor's wife, should we encourage you to express you love to the lady, or, rather, tell you there are more serious considerations like minimizing harm, seeking procreation, providing a stable environment for our offspring, etc. than your vague emotions of love/harmony , or your interest for my tail end ?
(June 30, 2021 at 9:14 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: He doesn’t care about any of that, he was just trying it on.
He’s worried about god, and I have to wonder...does he or does he not believe that all is the will of his god. You see two dudes fuckin, god wills it!
Am I missing something here?
All abrahamic religions condemn homosexuality. God purportedly destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, and will do the same to all homosexuals in the purported afterlife. Once one accepts the religious premise, it's impossible to defend homosexuality, as tackattack ridiculously tried above
(June 30, 2021 at 9:09 pm)Helios Wrote:Quote:I am not sure why you take these sidenotes so literally. It's really not hard to understand why homosexuality doesn't benefit survival and procreation, I don't even get why we're arguing about this.Nor does it harm it in any relevant way. Nor does it matter if it benefits survival and procreation. That doesn't make it wrong. And your definition of natural is still bullshit . Natural is whatever occurs in nature as i already pointed out and you failed to refute (seriously barking )
What's your definition of right and wrong, Helios? I am really curious to know.
