(July 2, 2021 at 3:56 pm)tackattack Wrote: OK so @Drich and @Klorophyll are on the same page, which is genetics don't play any part in homosexuality. I could cite the articles listed, or legitimate scientific studies, if they haven't already. I feel it's a fairly logical and supported position, but let's forgo that for now. Let's say genetics only play a part in whether you have a peepee or a vag (ignoring the neither or both scenario). I'll make it real simple.
1. Genetics determine your equipment
2. Your equipment is part of your sexual identity
3. Your sexual identity is part of your sexual orientation
Ergo: genetics does at least play some part in your sexual orientation.
If we can't even get past the premise, it's not even a chance we could get to the oughts and morality of it.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
