RE: Bore da!
November 10, 2011 at 8:09 am
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2011 at 8:12 am by fr0d0.)
Welcome Chad
First - just a couple of posts ago you described yourself as a deist. What gives???
Myths - I take it you're being sloppy with language here/ stating your honest lack of understanding/ seriously at odds with your whole belief regarding Christ???
The use of the term 'literal' in religious circles has become to mean the opposite of it's actual definition. A 'literal' understanding of Genesis one, for example is that it says nothing about material creation, yet leteralists, without evidence would assert the opposite.
I agree with you on the science stance. But I think you then fall into materialism trying to shoe horn faith into science. I think that's contradictory.
Prayer I'd agree totally. Having said that though... physical expression is supposedly meaningful and has merit.
...oh, and: helo a chroeso
First - just a couple of posts ago you described yourself as a deist. What gives???
Myths - I take it you're being sloppy with language here/ stating your honest lack of understanding/ seriously at odds with your whole belief regarding Christ???
The use of the term 'literal' in religious circles has become to mean the opposite of it's actual definition. A 'literal' understanding of Genesis one, for example is that it says nothing about material creation, yet leteralists, without evidence would assert the opposite.
I agree with you on the science stance. But I think you then fall into materialism trying to shoe horn faith into science. I think that's contradictory.
Prayer I'd agree totally. Having said that though... physical expression is supposedly meaningful and has merit.
...oh, and: helo a chroeso
