(August 18, 2021 at 11:54 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: I actually forgot that Ehrman thinks there was a historical Jesus.
The point I was making was, there are so many layers of obscurity, why even bother? And that applies to the historical Jesus and the legendary Jesus.
Exactly. There’s about as much chance of proving an historical Jesus by reading the Gospels as there is of proving an historical King Arthur by watching the musical ‘Camelot’.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
