(August 26, 2021 at 11:03 am)Spongebob Wrote:(August 26, 2021 at 10:47 am)brewer Wrote: You want hospitals built, staffed, and funded to be able to accommodate what if scenarios?
If you think about the nature of healthcare, does it make sense to have a system that is always near its capacity even when there is no outbreak of a new disease? That means if there is anything whatsoever, your system will break. Does that make sense?
When schools reach capacity or go a little beyond capacity, the typical reaction is to build a new school or at least expand an existing school. In a growing region, the student body will continue to grow. So its that or line kids up on the sidewalk. I don't see why hospitals should be any different. Of course there is one mitigating factor, the availability of medical staff. If that supply is restricted, then new beds are of no use.
Yes, but maybe you don't know what the average working capacity is normally: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1859...ince-2001/
Population increase is predictable and relatively static, unforeseen disease or disaster is not. The school comparison is not valid.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
