(August 27, 2021 at 12:53 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: To quote the title of the famous paper, I don't think you are "Giving Dualism Its Due."
You got a link? Google gave me multiple items. Not sure which is the "famous paper." I'd like to read it... sounds interesting.
I've always said that property dualism isn't that bad. It's a decent bare-bones assessment of things. That being said, there are plenty of reasons to consider physicalism of some kind more plausible. Brain states are heavily involved in conscious states. If someone postulates conscious states that aren't causally dependant on brain states, I want to ask for proof of that.