(September 7, 2021 at 10:53 am)HappySkeptic Wrote:(September 7, 2021 at 10:38 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: To paraphrase Lewis Black, nobody knows how the fuck economics works, so explain this to me: what is the advantage of a commodity-based currency over fiat currency?
Boru
For a currency to work, it has to have a limited supply, or people won't value it (or you get inflation).
For fiat currency, the limit is placed by the government. Bitcoin has a hard limit.
There are problems with both. With fiat currency, a government can be tempted to print too much. With bitcoin, the limited supply incentivizes treating it as an investment and not a currency.
For any currency to work, people have to believe that it will have similar buying power a year from now that it has today. If it goes down too much, it becomes worthless to hold, and if it goes up too much, it becomes risky to spend.
I wasn’t thinking specifically about Bitcoin - why is ANY commodity-based currency ‘better’ than a fiat currency? In the former, the value is determined by the amount of the commodity in existence. In the later, the value is determined by government decree (at least initially).
I fully understand that over-printing money can lead to inflation or even hyperinflation, but it doesn’t always. If a country has its currency tied to a commodity, an increase in the amount of that commodity will devalue the currency.
So, what’s the advantage of one over the other?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax