(September 7, 2021 at 1:36 pm)Spongebob Wrote:(September 7, 2021 at 1:15 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’d say the value of money is ‘fluid’ rather than ‘artificial’. What people are willing to pay for something changes, so the value of money changes. But the idea that money has value is intrinsic.
Boru
I suppose it's a comparable idea but if you boil it down to reality there's no need to soften the meaning. Imagine two Cro-Magnons meeting on common ground and trying to decide how many of these shiny metal arm bands they should trade for a bunch of hides. The value is quite arbitrary and likely takes time and many trades between many different people to come to any agreement. Even in our society now money has far less value to the extremely rich because they have so much of it.
What truly concerns me regarding any electronic currency is the reliance on our infrastructure. I feel that we often take it for granted in the rich industrialized countries. There are lots of places around the world where dependable electricity is not a given. We've seen localized weather events take down a grid for an entire state. That could grow to encompass the whole country or even more if the right event occurred. What will we do then?
Value is always arbitrary, otherwise how could an asshole named Hitler convince an entire nation to follow him off a cliff.
The key to peace isn't blind loyalty.
