(October 4, 2021 at 12:19 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(October 4, 2021 at 12:04 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Remain rare but possible. From the article linked by Naysayer. Sorry, the colour of the words was red and didn't show up for some reason.
Also, I don’t believe there’s any data on how long natural immunity lasts, or how effective it is compared to a vaccine. We actually have data on the effectiveness of the vaccine/s. Also, that Invermectin won a Nobel prize is completely irrelevant because it hasn’t been demonstrated to prevent or reduce the severity of COVID. You know what has? The goddamned vaccine. Please explain to me this line of reasoning:
“I’m not going to take the thing that has tons of data supporting its safety and efficacy behind it because I’m worried there isn’t enough data on its safety and efficacy, so instead I’m going to take these other things that have less data behind them, and/or data showing it’s not effective and potentially harmful.”
https://brisbanenationalreview.com/healt...weinstein/
Ivermectin is extremely safe, and even if it doesn't work, no harm done. It's certainly reasonable to say that Ivermectin is probably much safer than the vax. Personally, I took the vax, but still wanted to have Ivermectin on hand in case I contracted covid.
