(October 5, 2021 at 5:09 pm)Helios Wrote:Quote:7 of 11 scientists they consulted said it was gain of function. They did not ask hundreds of scientists and only find 11 who agreed. That's not what happened. Clearly, you did not read the Intercept article, and just concluded that it was misinformation because it disagrees with your preconceived notions.I never said they interviewed hundreds and only found 11 nor did I imply that. I said you found 11 scientists that a pitiful number to any kind of case on anything and the fact 3 rejected it just makes it worst. So this response just looks even sillier and doesn't refute my point at all. I concluded your case is pitiful because it is.
My apologies then. I believe you read the article. 7 of 11 agreeing that it's gain of function research is 63.6 percent belief that it's gain of function. How is that a pitiful number?
