(November 3, 2021 at 10:52 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Sounds like no one owns it. I can't imagine why any person wouldn't want to refer to some scientific observation to make their case, if there's one available. I think you'll find that the people here are more concerned with the mis-use of science, or the use of psuedo-science as though it were science.
Yes. The mis-use of science. This is where we are going to get into interpretations again.
Here’s an example:
The universe exists and the Big Bang happened.
An atheist says : I don’t know why it exists. It just is.
An agnostic atheist, let’s take the scientist Michio Kaku for example, will philosophize and says : There’s a multiverse that exists which creates new universes and Big Bangs randomly.
A theist will say: God created this universe because it’s fine-tuned for life.
Who is mis-using science here?