(November 3, 2021 at 12:02 pm)Jehanne Wrote:This is correct. None of these things will be proven for as long as humanity exists. Which is why the question is: Does anybody here have any problems with people using science to take a leap of faith and answer existential “why-s”?(November 3, 2021 at 11:55 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Well, there we go. Straight from a failed to launch god of the gaps into a doomed tu qoque.
I think that scientists and philosophers both would disagree with your appraisal in this regard.
That there is a God who created the finely tuned Universe is, and always will be, a possibility; problem is that such a proposition is an inherently untestable hypothesis, and as other naturalistic explanations (multiverse) exist, via Occam's Razor (the scientific principle of parsimony), the naturalistic models (which are testable) are to be preferred.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 28, 2025, 1:05 pm
Poll: Who should use science to support their beliefs? This poll is closed. |
|||
Everyone | 10 | 58.82% | |
Atheists only | 1 | 5.88% | |
Theists only | 0 | 0% | |
Other | 6 | 35.29% | |
Total | 17 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
The Ownership of Science
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science | FifthElement | 23 | 9386 |
June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am Last Post: Rahul |
|
Science Laughs: Science Comedian Brian Malow | orogenicman | 4 | 4857 |
December 10, 2010 at 12:06 pm Last Post: Lethe |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)