(November 3, 2021 at 2:14 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Except for how, as we've already discussed, that's wrong on the facts. Is that the only thing you can think of?
It probably doesn't even qualify as a religious belief, btw..more like a superstition. I doubt you'll be interested in sociology or anthropology if you can't be bothered to present biology accurately, ofc.
A religious belief.... concerns why it's important that -x. I think that our religious beliefs are meaningfully informed in many cases by actual facts. Am I wrong? Or, at least, am I wrong in your case? Would it be wrong to assume that for whatever portion of religious beliefs could be supported by actual facts, science would be a handy dandy way of gathering and communicating them?
I don’t understand you again.
What’s wrong on the facts?
I gave you one example and you don’t like it and then you say it’s not a religious belief?
