RE: The Ownership of Science
November 3, 2021 at 3:10 pm
(This post was last modified: November 3, 2021 at 3:12 pm by GaryAnderson.)
(November 3, 2021 at 3:06 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(November 3, 2021 at 2:59 pm)GaryAnderson Wrote: Dude, these are claims made using science. They can’t be proven. So basically you don’t want anybody to make claims using science. Fair enough.
That’s not how science works - NO scientific statements are ever proved. Proofs are restricted to mathematics and logical arguments.
‘Proved in science actually means confirmed to such a high degree of certainty that to withhold provisional assent would be perverse.’ - Issac Asimov.
Boru
You guys are having a lot of trouble with this concept which is why I love you guys so much. I also explained that science is an unbiased strict peer-reviewed process and doesn’t have an opinion or agenda on anything. It just explains HOW things work and sometimes it can answer “Why-s” on different topics.
I am asking if you have any problems with anybody using scientific facts to philosophize about something which can’t be proven by science.