RE: The Ownership of Science
November 3, 2021 at 7:05 pm
(This post was last modified: November 3, 2021 at 7:05 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(November 3, 2021 at 5:38 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(November 3, 2021 at 4:12 pm)GaryAnderson Wrote: We’re not on the same page here. The point is whether you have a problem with anyone using scientific facts to arrive at some unproven conclusion.
Works perfectly but you don’t have to like it and that’s fine. Same as saying “an infinite multiverse” which I don’t like but I’m not criticizing those scientists who support this view based on their work on other scientific areas such as string theory or quantum mechanics.
Logically it doesn’t work at all, let alone ‘perfectly’. If your premise assumes the conclusion, you’ve committed a fatal fallacy in basic logic. It’s nothing to do with me not liking it. Try it without God in the argument, and it STILL doesn’t work. Something like this:
-My car was specifically designed to transport ducks.
-I transport ducks in my car.
-Therefore, my car was specifically designed to transport ducks.
A logical fallacy is a logical fallacy, regardless of the subject of the argument.
Boru
He’s really killing it with his ‘free-of-charge’ logic exercises, isn’t he?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
